|
Post by Matthew on Mar 16, 2005 22:05:01 GMT -5
It aired November 2004; here's the synopsis: The Avatars enlist Leo to protect the Seer because she has information that could help them destroy the demons. Meanwhile, Brody reveals a secret to Paige, and Phoebe and Darryl continue to investigate Brody. Oh, that one. It's one of the Charisma Carpenter ones. I think he plays some sort of bad guy redshirt.. Huh.
|
|
|
Post by Matthew on Mar 16, 2005 22:07:02 GMT -5
So...when do people in the subway start getting suspicious of people in pretty suits coming out of the subway workers' doors? Hmmm? Well, if the subways were ANYTHING like they were in New York or Washington, I sho as hell wouldn't question ANYONE, no matter how they are dressed, coming out of ANY doors.. Heck, I'd do my best not to make eye contact.. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Sara on Mar 16, 2005 22:07:25 GMT -5
So...when do people in the subway start getting suspicious of people in pretty suits coming out of the subway workers' doors? Hmmm? I imagine they've got cameras so they can make sure no one's around when they exit; then all they have to do is blend in with the other folks waiting for the train. At least that's how it works in my head.
|
|
|
Post by raenstorm on Mar 16, 2005 22:08:36 GMT -5
lol...thank you both for the fanwankery
|
|
|
Post by Matthew on Mar 16, 2005 22:09:30 GMT -5
Oh, great. now I want to kill one of the wives on "Wifeswap" already.
Child abuse on the education. God, it's like watching a damn' train wreck....
|
|
|
Post by raenstorm on Mar 16, 2005 22:10:52 GMT -5
Oh, great. now I want to kill one of the wives on "Wifeswap" already. Child abuse on the education. God, it's like watching a damn' train wreck.... Right there with ya... What I'm wondering is - how the heck did these people in the treehouse, who do not appear to have tv, etc., even get involved in this show?? Hmmm, I suspect they're not quite as withdrawn from society as they claim.
|
|
|
Post by Matthew on Mar 16, 2005 22:13:52 GMT -5
Right there with ya... What I'm wondering is - how the heck did these people in the treehouse, who do not appear to have tv, etc., even get involved in this show?? Hmmm, I suspect they're not quite as withdrawn from society as they claim. Well, I'm thinking if they didn't have a television, the mom would actually SPEND more time than an hour a day on book work... Jesus... Oh lord, I think that the fifteen month old etc would be better off in daycare than in her care. I have to give the people that do this show their props: they pick some incredibly opposite people.. whoosh!! And this is NOT "Alias" so I will take my outraged (but still watching the show) self to the main thread to bitch about it henceforth... ;D
|
|
|
Post by Pixi on Mar 17, 2005 8:27:01 GMT -5
Hi guys - wish I could watch it with you and join in the commenting. I liked Sam, thought this ep was not quite up to the last two episode standards. I would have liked to know a little more about the back story of this bad guy - and he was just way too likeable. I didn't want Jack to kill him.
Not enough Vaughn, Dixon, arcy stuff for me.
What I did like was Syd was so likeable with Sam. I think they were definitely going for a Will vibe - can we keep Sam? He was sweet. I liked the ending between Syd and Jack too.
But the weapon was kind of lame. Ahhh its a remote helicopter. Hee, hee.
|
|
|
Post by Sara on Mar 19, 2005 10:52:55 GMT -5
Quoting Matthew from the main thread: But the.. with the,, and the, with the.... Oh, dammit. All true. But, as I'm about to point on in my review, we're talking about the same Sasha who had a man so frightened for his family's sake that he preferred slitting his own throat to facing the repercussions of failing in his mission. Who developed the Satan's County Chopper that almost took out Sydney. Who supplied weapons to terrorists as they slaughtered thousands of people in Rwanda, Sierra Leone and Angola. Yes, he was nice to Jack. Yes, he had a wife and a baby on the way. But he was not a good guy, and I don't mourn his death whatsoever--I only regret whatever toll killing the man took on Jack.
|
|
|
Post by Matthew on Mar 19, 2005 11:21:22 GMT -5
Quoting Matthew from the main thread: All true. But, as I'm about to point on in my review, we're talking about the same Sasha who had a man so frightened for his family's sake that he preferred slitting his own throat to facing the repercussions of failing in his mission. Who developed the Satan's County Chopper that almost took out Sydney. Who supplied weapons to terrorists as they slaughtered thousands of people in Rwanda, Sierra Leone and Angola. Yes, he was nice to Jack. Yes, he had a wife and a baby on the way. But he was not a good guy, and I don't mourn his death whatsoever--I only regret whatever toll killing the man took on Jack. True.. That last part is what I was mostly trying to raise as a point... but spoilers and such. And yes, he was a bastard who deserved DEATH DEATH DEATH DEATH. I'm just glad that his wife didn't wind up getitng killed somehow. and HEE! on the "Vaughn's Dad" thing.. do ya think he was Nadia's handler?
|
|
|
Post by Sara on Mar 19, 2005 11:25:07 GMT -5
True.. That last part is what I was mostly trying to raise as a point... but spoilers and such. And yes, he was a bastard who deserved DEATH DEATH DEATH DEATH. I'm just glad that his wife didn't wind up getitng killed somehow. and HEE! on the "Vaughn's Dad" thing.. do ya think he was Nadia's handler? I'm definitely beginning to wonder...
|
|
|
Post by Sara on Mar 19, 2005 15:05:45 GMT -5
|
|