|
Solo
Nov 10, 2005 19:35:16 GMT -5
Post by Matthew on Nov 10, 2005 19:35:16 GMT -5
Well. Peyton didn't seem entirely enthused at the idea of offing Rachel. Meaning I still have hope that she's working on the side of the angels. </rimshot>
|
|
|
Solo
Nov 10, 2005 19:35:57 GMT -5
Post by Sara on Nov 10, 2005 19:35:57 GMT -5
Karen! Good to see you, babe. Yeah, spork got a chuckle out of the brother and I as well. Hi sweetie! Loved the 'five by five' comment, too. Is that something new? The episode was written and directed by Jeffrey Bell, former executive producer of Angel--so I'm gonna go ahead and believe it was a deliberate homage. I don't think we've heard Marshall use it before, but as well all know the phrase is actually appropriate how he used it--to indicate he was receiving the transmission loud and clear.
|
|
|
Solo
Nov 10, 2005 19:41:23 GMT -5
Post by Matthew on Nov 10, 2005 19:41:23 GMT -5
Oh my.. strawberry blonde hooker. yeep.
Flashback.. The wind and the dress?
She has a nice smile. and a nice "you gotta be shitting me" expression, too, oddly.
Nice way to disguise the "scared shitless" with the predatory look.
shake hand?
Raymandy?
don't be coy...
she dropped her lipstick..
heh!!!Oh my.
AWESOME Smile!!! Game's in hand.
|
|
|
Solo
Nov 10, 2005 19:42:26 GMT -5
Post by Karen on Nov 10, 2005 19:42:26 GMT -5
LOLOL! 'Has baby been bad?' *snort* Was NOT expecting that. LOL! I'm twisted.
|
|
|
Solo
Nov 10, 2005 19:43:11 GMT -5
Post by Matthew on Nov 10, 2005 19:43:11 GMT -5
I'm guessing we'll be seeing Peyton again soon... on the escape?
She shows up, she's gotta kill Rachel, or reveal she's undercover: otherwise APO will know they have a mole....
head hurts...
|
|
|
Solo
Nov 10, 2005 19:50:40 GMT -5
Post by Matthew on Nov 10, 2005 19:50:40 GMT -5
Okay, not a good guy action..
*shuts up now and just watches...*
lipstick him..
Not good guy.
This is your signal to run and jump overboard.
hell no, jump off the platform! swim!
nice.. dress....
And hello Peyton.
"I was gonna say evil"
Well, hopefully she's not gonna kill you.
Bullshit. She won't let you live.
heh,
"You bitch!"
"yeah, but I would have felt bad about it.. now it's gonna be fun"
That's it, stay down...
fight suspended?
See, Rachel, that's how you escape your psycho ex teammate, just like she did.
How bad did she stick peyton?
|
|
|
Solo
Nov 10, 2005 19:59:09 GMT -5
Post by Matthew on Nov 10, 2005 19:59:09 GMT -5
Oh my, Arvin.... oh, no, he din't...
Dean, you just signed your death warrant.
"Your father's kind of scary"
Arvin's finally doing it.
Oh, that's just sweet, and sad.
Hee! She's mentoring her!
|
|
|
Solo
Nov 10, 2005 20:00:04 GMT -5
Post by Matthew on Nov 10, 2005 20:00:04 GMT -5
Arvin is such an amazing character, so stuck in between grace and hell..
|
|
|
Solo
Nov 10, 2005 20:00:58 GMT -5
Post by Sara on Nov 10, 2005 20:00:58 GMT -5
Is he conscious? Yeah, I think so. Then hit him again.
HEE!!
|
|
|
Solo
Nov 10, 2005 20:10:33 GMT -5
Post by Sara on Nov 10, 2005 20:10:33 GMT -5
I'm guessing we'll be seeing Peyton again soon... on the escape? She shows up, she's gotta kill Rachel, or reveal she's undercover: otherwise APO will know they have a mole.... head hurts... Yeah, that was an interesting encounter between the two of them. Peyton said all the expected things, but you could argue that she would know full well someone else (like Sydney) was listening to the conversation. While Rachel definitely pulled out a couple of nice surprises, would she really have been able to hold her own with a trained field agent that well? And I thought Peyton's response to Rachel was interesting: "let's just say we're on opposite sides." Strikes me as a strange equivocation. Either way, Rachel most definitely saved Peyton's life--which will create an interesting dilemma for Peyton the next time they cross paths, regardless of which side Peyton is on.
|
|
|
Solo
Nov 10, 2005 20:29:59 GMT -5
Post by Karen on Nov 10, 2005 20:29:59 GMT -5
I'm guessing we'll be seeing Peyton again soon... on the escape? She shows up, she's gotta kill Rachel, or reveal she's undercover: otherwise APO will know they have a mole.... head hurts... Yeah, that was an interesting encounter between the two of them. Peyton said all the expected things, but you could argue that she would know full well someone else (like Sydney) was listening to the conversation. While Rachel definitely pulled out a couple of nice surprises, would she really have been able to hold her own with a trained field agent that well? And I thought Peyton's response to Rachel was interesting: "let's just say we're on opposite sides." Strikes me as a strange equivocation. Either way, Rachel most definitely saved Peyton's life--which will create an interesting dilemma for Peyton the next time they cross paths, regardless of which side Peyton is on. Did Peyton have a chance to grab Rachel's bag with the disk in it before she bailed? I thought it was interesting that they showed that shot of her looking at it. Poor Sydney. Listening to a tape of Vaughn's, and the previous scene of her watching the happy family. Makes me wonder if they were setting up Vaughn's return.
|
|
|
Solo
Nov 10, 2005 20:30:54 GMT -5
Post by Karen on Nov 10, 2005 20:30:54 GMT -5
Hi sweetie! Loved the 'five by five' comment, too. Is that something new? The episode was written and directed by Jeffrey Bell, former executive producer of Angel--so I'm gonna go ahead and believe it was a deliberate homage. I don't think we've heard Marshall use it before, but as well all know the phrase is actually appropriate how he used it--to indicate he was receiving the transmission loud and clear. I'd like to think that it was deliberate, too! Just a neat little detail.
|
|
|
Solo
Nov 10, 2005 22:52:41 GMT -5
Post by Rachael on Nov 10, 2005 22:52:41 GMT -5
Well. Peyton didn't seem entirely enthused at the idea of offing Rachel. Meaning I still have hope that she's working on the side of the angels. That's an interesting fantasy life you have there, Sara. She's clearly amoral, if not downright evil. They keep making with the cold-blooded murders to convince us. And she was gonna kill Rachel. AND enjoy it. I rather like Evil Amy. ;D
|
|
|
Solo
Nov 11, 2005 9:33:48 GMT -5
Post by Sara on Nov 11, 2005 9:33:48 GMT -5
Well. Peyton didn't seem entirely enthused at the idea of offing Rachel. Meaning I still have hope that she's working on the side of the angels. That's an interesting fantasy life you have there, Sara. She's clearly amoral, if not downright evil. They keep making with the cold-blooded murders to convince us. And she was gonna kill Rachel. AND enjoy it. I rather like Evil Amy. ;D Yeah, I'm enjoying EA too. But that won't stop me from gloating if it turns out that I'm right about Peyton.
|
|
|
Solo
Nov 11, 2005 9:36:58 GMT -5
Post by Sara on Nov 11, 2005 9:36:58 GMT -5
Did Peyton have a chance to grab Rachel's bag with the disk in it before she bailed? I thought it was interesting that they showed that shot of her looking at it. My sense while watching is that Peyton looked at the bag, looked up at Dixon in the chopper, made eye contact with Dixon and realized that if she tried for the bag she was gonna be full of more holes than a college freshman's underwear, and decided to run for it instead. Live to fight another day and all that. Not to mention her visit to the store with all the baby things. But yeah, seeing her play Vaughn's voice for her belly was definitely a killer scene.
|
|