|
CLAIMS!
Oct 23, 2006 20:00:42 GMT -5
Post by Sue on Oct 23, 2006 20:00:42 GMT -5
Hugh and Patrick....move to Disputed list.
Check.
When I get back.
|
|
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 23, 2006 20:05:37 GMT -5
Post by Queen E on Oct 23, 2006 20:05:37 GMT -5
Oh, and Vincent D'onfrio. And I KNOW that one is not going to be disputed.
|
|
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 23, 2006 20:08:16 GMT -5
Post by Queen E on Oct 23, 2006 20:08:16 GMT -5
Sue: You can move the Tenth Doctor off the disputed list and onto the shared list. He's a Time Lord with a sonic screwdriver and a Tardis, for god's sake. I think he'll have enough time for both of us.
|
|
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 23, 2006 20:09:19 GMT -5
Post by Shan on Oct 23, 2006 20:09:19 GMT -5
Holy cow! Y'all DID make a claims thread!
#rofl1#
|
|
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 23, 2006 20:10:56 GMT -5
Post by Karen on Oct 23, 2006 20:10:56 GMT -5
Oh, and Vincent D'onfrio. And I KNOW that one is not going to be disputed. Hee!
|
|
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 23, 2006 20:12:25 GMT -5
Post by Squeemonster on Oct 23, 2006 20:12:25 GMT -5
No Way!! I claimed Patrick Dempsey and then took him off my list because it was hinted that I had too many and I had less than Karen!!! If she is allowed to have this many then I reclaim PD!!! #fence#
|
|
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 23, 2006 20:35:51 GMT -5
Post by Onjel on Oct 23, 2006 20:35:51 GMT -5
Ok. I can see I have to get moving on this ruling thing. Here's my decision, as final judge and arbiter. Subject, of course to ATp sanction.
Henceforth, from this time forward, all "claims" shall be deemed Notices of Preference. All Objects Persons who are the subject of the Notices of Preference shall be deemed community property, and may be checked out for use by the S'cubie membership. There will be no limit on the number of times any one Person of Preference may be checked out by respective members, but no one session shall last longer than 2 weeks at a time and sessions shall not be appended to each other to extend that two-week period. There must be at least 4 weeks between checkout sessions per Person of Preference by the same S'cubie, to give all members who desire access to their favorite objects.
Think of the Persons of Preference as very popular library books and treat them accordingly. Just remember not to dog-ear the edges or write in the margins, or you will be fined. Late return of any Person of Preference will result in the assessment of fines.
Notices of Preference may be posted here so all may have the ability to keep track of who prefers whom and may post pictures accordingly.
Checkouts may also be posted here if the honor system fails. ;D Oh, and I'll bang that gavel if I have to.
|
|
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 23, 2006 20:56:41 GMT -5
Post by Squeemonster on Oct 23, 2006 20:56:41 GMT -5
Ok. I can see I have to get moving on this ruling thing. Here's my decision, as final judge and arbiter. Subject, of course to ATp sanction.
Henceforth, from this time forward, all "claims" shall be deemed Notices of Preference. All Objects of the Notices of Preference shall be deemed community property, and may be checked out for use by the S'cubie membership. There will be no limit on the number of times any one Object of Preference may be checked out by respective members, but no one session shall last longer than 2 weeks at a time and sessions shall not be appended to each other to extend that two-week period. There must be at least 4 weeks between checkout sessions per Object of Preference by the same S'cubie, to give all members who desire access to their favorite objects.
Think of the Objects of Preference as very popular library books and treat them accordingly. Just remember not to dog-ear the edges or write in the margins, or you will be fined. Late return of any Object of Preference will result in the assessment of fines.
Notices of Preference may be posted here so all may have the ability to keep track of who prefers whom and may post pictures accordingly.
Checkouts may also be posted here if the honor system fails. ;D Oh, and I'll bang that gavel if I have to. #clap# #bid# #clap# #bid# #clap# Brilliant! I'm willing to agree to this, if everyone else is.
|
|
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 23, 2006 20:56:59 GMT -5
Post by Julia, wrought iron-y on Oct 23, 2006 20:56:59 GMT -5
I hereby assert my claim on preference for Rodney McKay, Xander Harris, D'argo, Bialar Crais, and Aeryn Sun, Miles O'Brian and Ezri Dax.
Julia, possibly also Blair Sandburg, unless Lola wants him
|
|
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 23, 2006 21:09:25 GMT -5
Post by Karen on Oct 23, 2006 21:09:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 23, 2006 21:13:20 GMT -5
Post by Karen on Oct 23, 2006 21:13:20 GMT -5
Ok. I can see I have to get moving on this ruling thing. Here's my decision, as final judge and arbiter. Subject, of course to ATp sanction.
Henceforth, from this time forward, all "claims" shall be deemed Notices of Preference. All Objects of the Notices of Preference shall be deemed community property, and may be checked out for use by the S'cubie membership. There will be no limit on the number of times any one Object of Preference may be checked out by respective members, but no one session shall last longer than 2 weeks at a time and sessions shall not be appended to each other to extend that two-week period. There must be at least 4 weeks between checkout sessions per Object of Preference by the same S'cubie, to give all members who desire access to their favorite objects.
Think of the Objects of Preference as very popular library books and treat them accordingly. Just remember not to dog-ear the edges or write in the margins, or you will be fined. Late return of any Object of Preference will result in the assessment of fines.
Notices of Preference may be posted here so all may have the ability to keep track of who prefers whom and may post pictures accordingly.
Checkouts may also be posted here if the honor system fails. ;D Oh, and I'll bang that gavel if I have to. That is a sane, just and reasonable ruling, Onjel. Ok - I need Sawyer/Josh for a bit. Or maybe DB. I saw some photos of him in next week's TVGuide that were Yummmmy! Also - Hugh Laurie. Is there a limit on how many we can check out at once?
|
|
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 23, 2006 21:16:33 GMT -5
Post by Onjel on Oct 23, 2006 21:16:33 GMT -5
Ok. I can see I have to get moving on this ruling thing. Here's my decision, as final judge and arbiter. Subject, of course to ATp sanction.
Henceforth, from this time forward, all "claims" shall be deemed Notices of Preference. All Objects of the Notices of Preference shall be deemed community property, and may be checked out for use by the S'cubie membership. There will be no limit on the number of times any one Object of Preference may be checked out by respective members, but no one session shall last longer than 2 weeks at a time and sessions shall not be appended to each other to extend that two-week period. There must be at least 4 weeks between checkout sessions per Object of Preference by the same S'cubie, to give all members who desire access to their favorite objects.
Think of the Objects of Preference as very popular library books and treat them accordingly. Just remember not to dog-ear the edges or write in the margins, or you will be fined. Late return of any Object of Preference will result in the assessment of fines.
Notices of Preference may be posted here so all may have the ability to keep track of who prefers whom and may post pictures accordingly.
Checkouts may also be posted here if the honor system fails. ;D Oh, and I'll bang that gavel if I have to. That is a sane, just and reasonable ruling, Onjel. Ok - I need Sawyer/Josh for a bit. Or maybe DB. I saw some photos of him in next week's TVGuide that were Yummmmy! Also - Hugh Laurie. Is there a limit on how many we can check out at once? Actually, ideally, one at a time, but in the interests of the slash fans among us, not to mention the threesome fans, the number is limited to no more than 3 Objects of Preference may be checked out at any one time by any one S'cubie.
|
|
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 23, 2006 21:19:06 GMT -5
Post by Anne, Old S'cubie Cat on Oct 23, 2006 21:19:06 GMT -5
That is a sane, just and reasonable ruling, Onjel. Ok - I need Sawyer/Josh for a bit. Or maybe DB. I saw some photos of him in next week's TVGuide that were Yummmmy! Also - Hugh Laurie. Is there a limit on how many we can check out at once? Actually, ideally, one at a time, but in the interests of the slash fans among us, not to mention the threesome fans, the number is limited to no more than 3 Objects of Preference may be checked out at any one time by any one S'cubie.What about the ones that Sue has never heard of? Can't I just hang onto them for a while longer? Gotta go, Emily's waiting for her turn.
|
|
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 23, 2006 21:23:51 GMT -5
Post by Onjel on Oct 23, 2006 21:23:51 GMT -5
Nope. The time limits are the time limits, regardless of identity at this point. For the more popular "library books" the time limits for check out sessions may be shortened and for those that are less well-known, they may be extended. But that requires amendment and will be addressed in future.
|
|
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 23, 2006 22:24:54 GMT -5
Post by Sue on Oct 23, 2006 22:24:54 GMT -5
Nope. The time limits are the time limits, regardless of identity at this point. For the more popular "library books" the time limits for check out sessions may be shortened and for those that are less well-known, they may be extended. But that requires amendment and will be addressed in future. Wait. Wait. Seems to me that "undisputed" objects (really, must we objectify these people?) of preference should be allowed to be claimed/owned/borrowed in perpetuity if no-one else is expressing preference for them. I submit that Mistress Onjel's rules/ruling need only apply to those disputed Persons of Preference, hereafter to be know as "D-POPs.""
|
|