|
CLAIMS!
Oct 23, 2006 22:25:34 GMT -5
Post by Sue on Oct 23, 2006 22:25:34 GMT -5
And, I'll update the Master List in the morning!
Keep those requests coming!
|
|
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 24, 2006 7:33:10 GMT -5
Post by Lola m on Oct 24, 2006 7:33:10 GMT -5
Heeee! You crazy kids you! As if any such claims will ever stop me from grabbing any one of these to be my pet, anytime I want. #smirk# Nice ruling, Onjel. I'm a firm believer in community property. It goes nicely with my fondness for threesomes and puppy piles. Actually, this will come in very handy in piccie present giving times . . . . Hmmmmmm. Snarky, sexy, with an underlying practical side. Who knew?
|
|
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 24, 2006 8:09:17 GMT -5
Post by Onjel on Oct 24, 2006 8:09:17 GMT -5
Nope. The time limits are the time limits, regardless of identity at this point. For the more popular "library books" the time limits for check out sessions may be shortened and for those that are less well-known, they may be extended. But that requires amendment and will be addressed in future. Wait. Wait. Seems to me that "undisputed" objects (really, must we objectify these people?) of preference should be allowed to be claimed/owned/borrowed in perpetuity if no-one else is expressing preference for them. I submit that Mistress Onjel's rules/ruling need only apply to those disputed Persons of Preference, hereafter to be know as "D-POPs."" Ahhhh, but what is undisputed now may become disputed in future, what with new members joining and tastes changing, and all. Therefore, my ruling stands.
|
|
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 24, 2006 9:19:08 GMT -5
Post by Sue on Oct 24, 2006 9:19:08 GMT -5
Wait. Wait. Seems to me that "undisputed" objects (really, must we objectify these people?) of preference should be allowed to be claimed/owned/borrowed in perpetuity if no-one else is expressing preference for them. I submit that Mistress Onjel's rules/ruling need only apply to those disputed Persons of Preference, hereafter to be know as "D-POPs."" Ahhhh, but what is undisputed now may become disputed in future, what with new members joining and tastes changing, and all. Therefore, my ruling stands. N'ubies gotta wait in line, I say. Or bring in fresh blood. (More updating and response to judicial fiats later.)
|
|
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 24, 2006 9:30:05 GMT -5
Post by Pixi on Oct 24, 2006 9:30:05 GMT -5
Well if we're claiming I claim:
Logan - on Veronica Mars Benji Schwimmer - from So You Think You Can Dance.
|
|
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 24, 2006 12:06:17 GMT -5
Post by leftylady on Oct 24, 2006 12:06:17 GMT -5
Rules: at what point does "abandonment" return the claimee to the public domain?
leftylady
|
|
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 24, 2006 16:29:46 GMT -5
Post by Lola m on Oct 24, 2006 16:29:46 GMT -5
Rules: at what point does "abandonment" return the claimee to the public domain? leftylady I say if you take your hand off them for a moment, it counts as abandonment.
|
|
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 24, 2006 16:41:52 GMT -5
Post by leftylady on Oct 24, 2006 16:41:52 GMT -5
Rules: at what point does "abandonment" return the claimee to the public domain? leftylady I say if you take your hand off them for a moment, it counts as abandonment. Sounds reasonable enough!
|
|
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 24, 2006 20:58:27 GMT -5
Post by Anne, Old S'cubie Cat on Oct 24, 2006 20:58:27 GMT -5
Rules: at what point does "abandonment" return the claimee to the public domain? leftylady I say if you take your hand off them for a moment, it counts as abandonment. Some activities don't need hands. Just sayin'... Anne, and clams don't have hands anyway
|
|
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 25, 2006 22:29:52 GMT -5
Post by Spaced Out Looney on Oct 25, 2006 22:29:52 GMT -5
I also want to express a preference for Gary Sinese. I like the idea of using the thread to know what pretties to give who. Not that I do that that often, but I could. Does that mean I should import my entire list of actors and such that I like to follow?
|
|
karen should be working
Guest
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 26, 2006 10:03:01 GMT -5
Post by karen should be working on Oct 26, 2006 10:03:01 GMT -5
I also want to express a preference for Gary Sinese. I like the idea of using the thread to know what pretties to give who. Not that I do that that often, but I could. Does that mean I should import my entire list of actors and such that I like to follow? I don't know if we have that much bandwidth. I LOVE Gary Sinise!
|
|
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 27, 2006 6:32:45 GMT -5
Post by S'ewing S'cubie on Oct 27, 2006 6:32:45 GMT -5
Okay, I know I've been away a while, but this? This is silly.
Diane *who doesn't have to worry about claiming anything since she already has the one she wants.
|
|
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 27, 2006 7:43:00 GMT -5
Post by Lola m on Oct 27, 2006 7:43:00 GMT -5
Okay, I know I've been away a while, but this? This is silly. Diane *who doesn't have to worry about claiming anything since she already has the one she wants. Awwwwww! And, heeeee! Yes, they are being very cutely silly, aren't they?
|
|
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 27, 2006 7:54:40 GMT -5
Post by Sue on Oct 27, 2006 7:54:40 GMT -5
Okay, I know I've been away a while, but this? This is silly. Diane *who doesn't have to worry about claiming anything since she already has the one she wants. Yep. That was pretty much the point. (That and a database of drool-worthies for when I finally lose my last brain cell and can't remember any names.) [And I AM still planning on updating both lists and "Rules".]
|
|
|
CLAIMS!
Oct 30, 2006 10:21:40 GMT -5
Post by Shan on Oct 30, 2006 10:21:40 GMT -5
I also want to express a preference for Gary Sinese. I like the idea of using the thread to know what pretties to give who. Not that I do that that often, but I could. Does that mean I should import my entire list of actors and such that I like to follow? Oh, dangit! I'm too late!
|
|