|
Post by DaveCrenshaw on Oct 23, 2003 14:34:23 GMT -5
However it is they do it on the Verizon commercials when the guy says, "Can you hear me now? Good."
|
|
|
Post by Betsy on Oct 23, 2003 14:34:26 GMT -5
Found this on the Spike on Angel site.
On the WB, Angel (4.4/ 6) continues to squash UPN's Jake 2.0 (R, 2.1/ 3) with a 110 percent advantage last night. Even so, retention of just 70 percent for Angel out of Smallville (versus 72 percent for Jake 2.0 out of Enterprise) is concerning.
I'd say retaining 70% of the viewers from Smallville is good. Why concerning? How many Angel viewers are there that come from another show, or from no show at all? On Wednesday nites, at least til That 70's Show comes one, my TV is off til 9 pm.
But I think the 4.4 is pretty darn good. Don't know what it was pulling last season in this slot.
|
|
|
Post by Sue on Oct 23, 2003 14:35:05 GMT -5
Hence the reason S 3 exists, and people like myself who aren't Spike fanatics are here. Because those other people out there are poo-poo-heads. Absolutely. And we would never stoop to their level by childish name calling and finger signs. Right?
|
|
|
Post by Betsy on Oct 23, 2003 14:35:19 GMT -5
Okay, the next time I go to a board notorious for Spike-hating "just to see what they are saying" someone hit me over the head and drag me back I swear, some people can twist every little act he does into some great big world-ending evil plan. If I could reach into the computer screen and grab someone's hair, I would have done it ten minutes ago. I know I'm not the biggest Angel fan, but I do give him the props he deserves. I'm trying to calm down now. Never going back there again. Which place was this Caraleigh?
|
|
|
Post by DaveCrenshaw on Oct 23, 2003 14:35:40 GMT -5
Part 57 has been restored. We will continue here, but your brilliant posts are preserved. Thank you! *bright smile* [/size] [/b][/quote]You go, Techno-Bot. I think Willow might nearly have all those bugs worked out of your matrix after all. Or maybe not -- but still, nice to see you trying so hard.
|
|
|
Post by SpringSummers on Oct 23, 2003 14:37:20 GMT -5
Found this on the Spike on Angel site. On the WB, Angel (4.4/ 6) continues to squash UPN's Jake 2.0 (R, 2.1/ 3) with a 110 percent advantage last night. Even so, retention of just 70 percent for Angel out of Smallville (versus 72 percent for Jake 2.0 out of Enterprise) is concerning.
I'd say retaining 70% of the viewers from Smallville is good. Why concerning? How many Angel viewers are there that come from another show, or from no show at all? On Wednesday nites, at least til That 70's Show comes one, my TV is off til 9 pm. But I think the 4.4 is pretty darn good. Don't know what it was pulling last season in this slot. An optimistic article about the ratings - says AtS has had a big increase from last year: u.dailynews.com/Stories/0,1413,211%7E23544%7E1705881,00.html
|
|
|
Post by DaveCrenshaw on Oct 23, 2003 14:37:29 GMT -5
Absolutely. And we would never stoop to their level by childish name calling and finger signs. Right? Abso-freakin-lutely!
|
|
|
Post by LeeHollins on Oct 23, 2003 14:38:11 GMT -5
Part 57 has been restored. We will continue here, but your brilliant posts are preserved. Thank you! *bright smile* [/size] [/b][/quote] When I click into the part, I still can only get pages 1-15.
|
|
|
Post by DaveCrenshaw on Oct 23, 2003 14:39:01 GMT -5
Time for me to go to my other job. Techno-Bot has the floor. Please, no one cause her to fry a microchip. She's working her gyros off today, so support her all you can.
Good evening all.
DAVE
|
|
|
Post by John G on Oct 23, 2003 14:39:43 GMT -5
When I click into the part, I still can only get pages 1-15. Oh thank goodness......I mean...darn, my brilliance will still never be appreciated! (STAY OUT OF THIS TECHNOBOT!)
|
|
|
Post by missbuffy on Oct 23, 2003 14:40:25 GMT -5
Found this on the Spike on Angel site. On the WB, Angel (4.4/ 6) continues to squash UPN's Jake 2.0 (R, 2.1/ 3) with a 110 percent advantage last night. Even so, retention of just 70 percent for Angel out of Smallville (versus 72 percent for Jake 2.0 out of Enterprise) is concerning.
I'd say retaining 70% of the viewers from Smallville is good. Why concerning? How many Angel viewers are there that come from another show, or from no show at all? On Wednesday nites, at least til That 70's Show comes one, my TV is off til 9 pm. But I think the 4.4 is pretty darn good. Don't know what it was pulling last season in this slot. One thing to note is that Jake 2.0 was a repeat last night, so not much real competition there. And I think the concern would be that Angel should be holding more of Smallville's viewers than the amount Jake is holding from Enterprise?
|
|
|
Post by jax (f/k/a "jackson daley") on Oct 23, 2003 14:40:44 GMT -5
Now, why is it that my two sad little lonely posts have disappeared? I know there was some sort of glitch, and it's apparently been fixed now, but I've gone back and looked and don't see me anywhere. I was sort of hoping someone would have SOMETHING to say about my theory about Reaper really being Sahjahn - even if it was just to tell me I'm nuts!
|
|
|
Post by DaveCrenshaw on Oct 23, 2003 14:41:32 GMT -5
When I click into the part, I still can only get pages 1-15. I think she means that THIS part has been restored -- because of a bit of confusion and two hard-working techopagans that weren't communicating, Part 58 was opened and then immediately shut down and part 59 opened. Part 59 has been deleted and Part 58 has been re-opened, obviously. Moloch still has control of Part 57, and refuses to give it up. What was that number for goats again?
|
|
|
Post by karalee on Oct 23, 2003 14:42:08 GMT -5
Absolutely. And we would never stoop to their level by childish name calling and finger signs. Right? Dave- Yes, they are Poo-Poo heads and a whole lot of other words. Sue- Too bad we don't have a smiley that's giving the finger
|
|
|
Post by SpringSummers on Oct 23, 2003 14:42:11 GMT -5
Oh thank goodness......I mean...darn, my brilliance will still never be appreciated! (STAY OUT OF THIS TECHNOBOT!) John, I have to say, I read that brilliant analysis, and I disagreed with every word. Sorry.
|
|